نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استادیار، مدیریت ورزشی، گروه تربیت بدنی، دانشگاه صنعتی خواجه نصیرالدین طوسی، تهران، ایران

2 دانشجوی دکتری، گروه مدیریت ورزشی، دانشکدة تربیت بدنی و علوم ورزشی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران

چکیده

هدف از پژوهش حاضر شناسایی و رتبه‌بندی مهارت‌های پژوهشی دانشجویان تحصیلات تکمیلی دانشکدة تربیت بدنی دانشگاه تهران بود. این تحقیق براساس هدف، کاربردی و از نظر روش بررسی، توصیفی از نوع پیمایشی بود. جامعة آماری پژوهش را دانشجویان تحصیلات تکمیلی دانشکدة تربیت بدنی دانشگاه تهران تشکیل دادند. نمونة آماری پژوهش به‌صورت در دسترس و تعداد 80 نفر انتخاب شدند. به‌منظور جمع‌آوری داده‌های تحقیق از روش میدانی با استفاده از مصاحبه و پرسشنامة محقق‌ساخته (0.97=α) استفاده شد. به‌منظور تبیین و تحلیل داده‌ها از تحلیل عاملی اکتشافی و آزمون T تک‌نمونه‌ای استفاده شد. نتایج پژوهش نشان‌دهندة پنج بُعد به‌عنوان مهارت‌های پژوهش‌گری بود که به‌ترتیب مهارت‌های طراحی ابزار تحقیق، تفسیر نتایج تحقیق، مهارت‌های آماری، جمع‌بندی نتایج تحقیق و جست‌وجو در ادبیات تحقیق، رتبه‌بندی شدند که نقاط ضعف تا قوت دانشجویان تحصیلات تکمیلی تربیت بدنی بودند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Identification and Rating of the Research Skills in Higher Education Students of the Faculty of Physical Education, University of Tehran

نویسندگان [English]

  • sholeh khodadad kashi 1
  • saeed jafari 2

1 Assistant professor, K.N Toosi University of Technology- Iran

2 Ph.D Student of Sport Management, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran;

چکیده [English]

The aim of this study was to identify and rate the research skills in higher education students of Faculty of Physical Education, University of Tehran. This study was applied in terms of objectives and descriptive survey in terms of method. The statistical population included higher education students of Faculty of Physical Education, University of Tehran. The sample consisted of 80 students who were selected by convenience sampling method. The field method including interviews and a researcher-made questionnaire (α=0.97) were used to collect data. Exploratory factor analysis and one-sample t test were applied to explain and analyze the data. The results revealed five dimensions as research skills; they were rated as research instrument design, interpretation of research results, statistical skills, summarizing research results and searching the literature respectively. They were weaknesses and strengths of the higher education students of physical education.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • higher education
  • physical education
  • research skills
  • student
  • University of Tehran
1.        Izadi S, Baradaran M, Karimkhani Z. Investigation of the Research skills in various university courses: (Case Studies, Faculty of Humanities, University of Mazandaran). J High Educ Curric Stud. 2015;5(9):26-51. [In Persian].
2.        Fazlallahi S. Inhibiting factors affecting student research. Islam Educ Res. 2013;1(7):165-184. [In Persian].
3.        Niksirat M, Badri A, Rezvani M. Factors affecting the selection of research topics students in geography and rural planning. J Res Plan High Educ. 2013;65:87-110. [In Persian].
4.        Feli S, Pezeshkirad G, Chizari M. Factors affecting students’ participation in research activities and knowledge production. J Res Plan High Educ. 2007;42:93-107. [In Persian].
5.        Mizani M, Khabiri M, Sajadi N. To evaluate the ability of graduate students in physical education and quality teacher’s tips on writing theses. J Sport Manag. 2012;61:111-134. [In Persian].
6.        Gray C, Turner R, Sutton C, Petersen C, Stevens S, Swain J, et al. Research methods teaching in vocational environments: developing critical engagement with knowledge? J Vocat Educ Train. 2015;1–20.
7.        Atghia N. Assessing the quality of higher education in the field of Physical Education and Sport Sciences State Universities According to the students, faculty and Administrators courses. Sport Manag Stud. 2013;16:13-36. [In Persian].
8.        Parirokh M, Arastopour S, Naderi R. The effectiveness of information literacy workshops for graduate students: Research with field-oriented approach. A Res Libr. 2012;1(2):201-224. [In Persian].
9.        Tavakol M, Ghaemirad M, Zolfaghari M. Graduate students in the study of sociological problems finding a thesis. J High Educ Iran. 2013;5(1):133-164. [In Persian].
10.      Hejazi Y, Abasi E. Effective Factors in Increasing the Quality of M.S. Theses in Agricultural Faculty, Tehran University. J Agric Sci Iran. 2003;33(2):297-304. [In Persian].
11.      Mizani M, Khabiri M, Honari H, Sajadi N. The problems of developing master’s thesis at the University of Physical Education and Sport Sciences selected. J Sport Manag. 2014;16:149-169. [In Persian].
12.      Nikroz L, Rozitalab M, Rayegan Shirazi A, Naghizade M, Taghavi F. Investigate factors related to student research projects. J Fasa Univ Med Sci. 2013;2(2):113-119. [In Persian].
13.      Imafuku R, Saiki T, Kawakami C, Suzuki Y. How do students’ perceptions of research and approaches to learning change in undergraduate research? Medical Education Development Center, Gifu University. Int J Med Educ. 2015;6:47-55.
14.      Burton F, Schofield C. Student confidence in using and applying research methods whilst studying within a sport and exercise discipline. J Appl Res High Educ. 2011;3(1):2-15.
15.      Shajie R, Gholamian J, Javadiansaraf N. Determine the attitudes, skills and attitudes towards information technology graduate students. Complet High Educ. 2010;2(6):101-119. [In Persian].
16.      Atghia N, Karimi K. Handling the view of Master students’ physical education and sports science PNU compared to the current situation of education and research. J Emerg Trends Sport Manag. 2014;1(1):79-96. [In Persian].
17.      Gal M, Borg V, Gal G. Qualitative and quantitative research methods in Psychology. 3rd ed. Translating Translators Group. Tehran, PA: Shahid Beheshti University; 2008. 385 p.
18.      Meerah T, Arsad N. Developing research skills at secondary school. Procedia - Soc Behav Sci. 2010;9:512-516.
19.      Schofield C, Burton F. The development of a research methods toolkit to support sport science undergraduates and lecturers. J Appl Res High Educ. 2011;3(1):28-34.
20.      Onwuegbuzie A. Academic procrastination and statistics anxiety. Assess Eval High Educ. 2004;29(1):3–19.
21.      Rezai M, Hosein pour A. Research skills for graduate students Sari University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources. Res J Agric Ext Educ. 2016;8(1):1-15. [In Persian].
22.      Hogle J. Survey of instructional technology use in poultry science education. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Georgia). Dissertation Abstract International. 1999. p. 60–288.
23.      Howard A, Ferguson M, Wilkinson P, Campbell K. Involvement in research activities and factors influencing research capacity among dietitians. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2013;26(1):180–187.