ارائه مدل توسعه دیپلماسی از طریق ورزش

محمدحسن, فهیمه; هنری, حبیب; فراهانی, ابوالفضل; صفانیا, علی محمد; باقریان فرح آبادی, محسن

doi:10.22059/jsm.2020.299042.2425

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

¹ گروه مدیریت ورزشی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد علوم و تحقیقات، تهران، ایران

² گروه مدیریت ورزشی، دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی، تهران، ایران

³ گروه مدیریت ورزشی، دانشگاه پیام نور، تهران، ایران

⁴ گروه مدیریت و برنامه‌ریزی در تربیت بدنی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد علوم و تحقیقات، تهران، ایران

10.22059/jsm.2020.299042.2425

چکیده

مقدمه: پژوهش حاضر با هدف ارائۀ مدل توسعۀ دیپلماسی از طریق ورزش انجام گرفت.
روش پژوهش: روش‌شناسی پژوهش از نوع کیفی و نظریة داده‌بنیاد با استفاده از رویکرد اشتراوس و کوربین بود. جامعة آماری پژوهش مشتمل بر رؤسای فدراسیون‌های المپیکی، سیاستمداران و صاحب‌نظران و خبرگان علمی که در امور بین‌الملل فعالیت داشته‌اند، بود و نمونه‌گیری تا رسیدن به اشباع نظری ادامه یافت. برای تعیین نمونه‌های این پژوهش از روش نمونه‌گیری هدفمند استفاده شد و 19 نفر به‌عنوان مصاحبه‌شونده در نظر گرفته شدند. برای جمع‌آوری داده‌ها از مصاحبه‌های نیمه‌ساختاریافته استفاده شد. مقوله‌ها، مفاهیم و گویه‌ها برای شرایط علی، عوامل زمینه‌ای، عوامل مداخله‌گر، راهبردها و پیامدها در نرم‌افزار MAXQDA استخراج شد.
یافته‌ها: 297 گزارۀ مفهومی اولیه با 13 مقوله و 73 مفهوم در قالب پارادایمی در چهار حوزة کارکرد ورزش، عوامل مدیریتی، سیاست خارجی و ساختار ورزش بوده است.
نتیجه‌گیری: کارکرد ورزش (شامل کارکرد سیاسی ورزش، کارکرد اقتصادی ورزش، کارکرد اجتماعی ورزش و توسعۀ روابط بین‌الملل)، عوامل مدیریتی (شامل آموزش و تربیت نیروی انسانی، مدیریت دانش و عامل رسانه و روابط بین‌الملل)، سیاست خارجی (شامل ورزش و سیاست خارجی و عامل سیاست خارجی و ورزش) و آخرین حوزه مربوط به ساختار ورزش (شامل کرسی‌های بین‌المللی، سیاستگذاری و برنامه‌ریزی، ساختار سازمان‌های ورزشی و عامل جایگاه ورزش کشور در جهان) قابل تقسیم هستند. همچنین روابط بین مقوله‌های شکل‌گرفته در داده‌ها نشان داد که الگوی به‌دست‌آمده با شکل اصلی الگوی پارادایمی اشتراوس و کوربین تطابق دارد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

مدیریت ورزشی

عنوان مقاله [English]

Proposing Development Model of Diplomacy through Sport

نویسندگان [English]

Fahimeh Mohammadhassan ¹
Habib Honari ²
Aboualfazl Farahani ³
Ali Mohammad Safania ⁴
Mohsen Bagherian ⁴

¹ Department of Sport Management, Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch, Tehran, Iran

² Department of Sport Management, Payam Noor University, Tehran, Iran

³ Department of Sport Management, Payam Noor University, Tehran, Iran

⁴ Department of Sport Management, Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch, Tehran, Iran

چکیده [English]

Introduction: The present study conducted with the aim of proposing development model of diplomacy through sport.
Methods: Research methodology was qualitative and grounded theory using Strauss & Corbin approach. The statistical population included the presidents of Olympic federations, Politicians, scholars and experts who had experience in international affairs activities, and sampling continued until theoretical saturation. To select samples targeted sampling was used and 19 people were considered as interviewees. Semi-structured interviews were used to collect data. Using MAXQDA software, Categories, concepts and items were extracted in order to recognize causes, context, phenomenon, strategies and consequence.
Results: There were 297 preliminary conceptual statements with 13 categories and 73 concepts in paradigm format in four areas including application of sport, managerial factors, foreign policy and the structure of sport.

Conclusion: Based on the findings the areas are divided as follow: the application of sport (including political application of sport, economical application of sport, social application of sport and development of international relations), managerial factors (including education and training of human resources, knowledge management, media and international relationships), foreign policy (including sport and foreign policy and foreign policy and sport) and the last area was related to the structure of sport (including international seats, policy making and planning, sports organization structure, and the place of sport of Iran in the world). In addition, the relationship between the categories showed that the obtained model matches the original format of Strauss & Corbin paradigm model.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

International Relations
Sports Diplomacy
Foreign Policy
Sports Application
Development

مراجع

Boyacıoğlu. F. & Gürsel O. &Ahmet, A. The Role of Sports in International Relations. Acta Universitatis Danubius. Relationes Internationales, 2016; 9 (1). pp. 100.

Zargar, A. Sports and International Relations, Theory and conceptual aspects, Political sciences quarterly, 2015; 11 (31). pp. 7-19. (in Persian)

Murray, S. Moving beyond the ping-pong table: sport diplomacy in the modern diplomatic environment. PD Magazine, 2013; 9, p11-16.

Nicholson, M., Hoye, R., Houlihan, B. Participation in Sport: International policy perspectives, by Routledge: British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data. 2013; Pp.46.

Murray, S. The Two Halves of Sports-Diplomacy, Diplomacy & Statecraft, 2012; 23 (3), p576–592.

Sabbagh Novin, M. Comparison of conditions of international relations departments of national university sport federations, M.A. thesis, Educational Sciences, Payam Noor University. 2015; pp. 39-67 (Persian).

Taylor, T. Sport and International Relations: A case of mutual neglect in Allison, L. The Politics of Sport, Manchester University Press, Manchester. 1986; Chapter 2,pp.1690

Ghavam, A. Analyzing international politics in the context of the international community's approach. Tehran, Research Institute of Humanities and Cultural Studies. 2009; (in Persian).

Hadian, N. & Ahadi, A. The Conceptual Position of Public Diplomacy, Journal of Foreign Relations, 2009; 1 (3), pp 85-119. (in Persian).

Ghasemi, H., Pourkiani, M. , Sabagh Novin, M. Comparing the Situation of International Relation between Iranian National Federation and other Countries. Journal of Communication Management in Sports Media, summer 2018; 5 (20), pp. 91-99. (in Persian)

Shariati Feizabadi, M. & Goudarzi, M. The Position of Sport Diplomacy in International Relation departments of Islamic Republic of Iran. Qualitative approach based on content analysis, Journal of Political Science, 2015;11 (2), No.22, pp 95-127. (in Persian).

Malakoutian, M. Sports and policy, Faculty of Law and Political Sciences, 2009;39 (2), pp 301-316. (in Persian).

Peymanfar, M. Developing a Strategic Model for the Development of Sport Diplomacy of the Islamic Republic of Iran, PhD dissertation, Kharazmi University, 2015. (in Persian)

Emadzadeh, M. Analysis of business environment, Tehran, the world of economy. 2008 (in Persian).

Nassiri Moghadam, M. Explaining the relationship of the World Cup to foreign relations of countries, M.A. thesis, Faculty of Geography, Tarbiat Modarres University.2012 (in Persian).

Khabiri, M. Investigating the Position of Exercise in Public Diplomacy of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Research project of ministry of youth and sport, Iran. 2009, pp. 29-93(in Persian).

Shariati Feizabadi, M. Designing and modeling the components of sport diplomacy in the development of international relations, PhD dissertation, University of Tehran. 2015, pp. 12-69 (in Persian).

Fazeli, H. Sports and identity politics. Journal of Political Science, 2012; 7 (2), pp151-174. (in Persian)

Deos, A. (2014). Sport and relational public diplomacy: the case of New Zealand and Rugby World Cup 2011, Sport in Society, 17(9), p1170-1186.

Lin, Ch. Y., Lee, P. Ch., Nai, H. F. Theorizing the Role of Sport in State-Politics, International Journal of Sport and Exercise Science, 2008;1(1), p23-32.

Jackson, S. J., Haigh, S. Between and beyond politics: Sport and foreign policy in a globalizing world, Sport in Society, 2008; 11(4), p349-358.

Hamzelou, Y. Studying the effects of sport development on the process of Iran globalization, M.A. thesis, Hakim Sabzevari University. 2014; (in Persian).

Kyung, H.L. The globalization process of sports in Korean society: changing paradigms and perspectives beyond boundaries. International Sports Studies, 2005; 1, 29-43.

Merkel, U. The politics of sport diplomacy and reunification in divided Korea. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 2008; 43(3), 289-311.

Şahin M.Y. Yenel, F. Çolakoglu, T. Sport and nationalism interaction: sports’ place and importance creating national identity. Human Sciences, 2010; 7: 1244-63.

Robertson, R. Sport diplomacy in conflict environment: the case of continued efforts in Public Diplomacy, 2013; 3(1), 30-39.

Anastasovski, I. Stojanoska, T. & Qazimi, A. Sport as a substitute for diplomatic activities. Professional Paper, 2013; 1(2), 79-82.

Kristiansen, R.R. & Reimer, M.B. The Economic Impact of Major Sporting Events. Unpublished Bachelor Thesis, Aarhus University. 2011, pp 32-89

Allison, L. Understanding International Sport Organizations, 1st Edition, Routeldge Publication, 2017; pp. 76-190

Yamamoto, M. Y. Development of the sporting nation: sport as a strategic area of national policy in Japan, International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics, 2012; 4(2), p277-296.

Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. M. Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Sage Publications, Inc. 1990

Kobierecki, M.Y. Sport in International Relations: Expectations, Possibilities and Effects. No 1 . Interdisciplinary Political and cultural Journal. 2013

https://www.ukessays.com/essays/international-relations/sports-plays-a-significant-role-in-international-relations.php?vref=1

Anderson, P. H. (2017). Quantifying the Value of Sport Diplomacy to Non-State Actors (Doctoral dissertation, University of Oregon).