نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
دانشجوی ارشد مدیریت ورزشی، دانشکدة علوم ورزشی، دانشگاه اصفهان، اصفهان، ایران
چکیده
به‌کارگیری اماکن ورزشی برای انجام فعالیت بدنی و ورزش به‌واسطة مصرف انرژی موجب انتشار گازهای گلخانه‌ای می‌شود. بنابراین، هدف این تحقیق ارزیابی رفتار حفاظت زیست‌محیطی اماکن ورزشی باشگاه ذوب‌آهن اصفهان با استفاده از شاخص انتشار دی‌اکسید کربن بود.
روش تحقیق توصیفی ـ تحلیلی بود. مجموعة ورزشی ملت باشگاه ذوب‌آهن اصفهان به‌عنوان نمونة مطالعاتی مدنظر قرار گرفته بود. ابزار تحقیق چک‌لیست محقق‌ساخته بود که روایی آن توسط متخصصان حوزة محیط زیست و مدیریت ورزشی تأیید شد. پایایی ابزار تحقیق از طریق پایایی درون‌ارزیاب بررسی شد که ضریب توافق بین دو ارزیابی 81/0 محاسبه شد. در تحلیل داده‌ها از راهنمای مصرف انرژی(ECG78) در سازه‌های تفریحی ـ ورزشی انگلستان استفاده شد.
نتایج نشان داد میزان دی‌اکسید کربن انتشاریافته در مجموعة ورزشی ملت بالاتر از سطح استانداردهای زیست‌محیطی است. میزان انتشار دی‌اکسید کربن در هر متر مربع از سالن ورزشی، رختکن، محوطه ـ پارکینگ و زمین چمن به‌ترتیب 28/102، 36/239، 46/13 و 30/12 کیلوگرم به ازای یک روز بود.
نتایج بیانگر این است که مصرف انرژی در مجموعة ورزشی ملت به‌ویژه در بخش روشنایی، موجب انتشار دی‌اکسید کربن به میزان بالاتری از سطح استاندارد شده است. بنابراین، مدیریت بهینة مصرف انرژی در اماکن ورزشی باشگاه ذوب‌آهن و تلاش در جهت کاهش انتشار دی‌اکسید کربن و رساندن آن به سطح استاندارد برای کاهش خطرهای زیست‌محیطی می‌تواند در دستور کار مدیران باشگاه قرار گیرد.
کلیدواژه‌ها
عنوان مقاله [English]
The Evaluating of Pro-Environmental Behavior of Sport Facilities of Zob Ahan Club of Isfahan by Apply the Carbon Dioxide Emission Index (Case Study: Mellat Sports Complex)
نویسندگان [English]
- Roza Darabi
- Ahmad Ali Asefi
M.S Student of sport management, Sport science Faculty, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran
چکیده [English]
purpose of study was to the evaluating of pro-environmental behavior of sport facilities of Zob Ahan club of Isfahan by apply the carbon dioxide emission index (Case Study: Mellat Sports Complex). The research method was descriptive in the type of analytical. In this research, Mellat Sports Complex of Zob Ahan club of Isfahan was considered as a statistical sample. The research tool was a researcher-made checklist whose validity was confirmed by environmental and sports management experts. In order to measure the reliability of the research instrument, the inter-evaluator reliability was used, and the coefficient of agreement between the two evaluations was calculated )0.81(. The Energy Consumption Guide 78 (ECG78) in sports and recreation buildings of the United Kingdom was used to analyze the data. The results showed that the amount of carbon dioxide emitted in Mellat Sports Complex was higher than environmental standards. The amount of CO2 emissions per square meter of sport hall, locker room, parking and lawn field 102/28, 239/36, 13/46 and 12/30 kg, respectively. The results showed that energy consumption in Mellat Sports Complex, especially in the lighting sector, has caused CO2 emissions to be higher than the standard level. Therefore, the optimal management of energy consumption in the sports facilities of Zob Ahan club and efforts to reduce carbon dioxide emissions and bring it to the standard level to reduce environmental hazards can be on the agenda of the club management.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
- Greenhouse gases
- Sport complex
- Pro-environmental behavior
- Carbon dioxide
- Energy Consumption
Kashef, Mir Mohammad (2012). "Sports Facilities and Spaces Management: Indicators of optimization in design, construction and operation." Urmia University Press, Frist Edition, Vol. 2.
- Iran National Building Regulations (2010). "Article 19 of the Iran National Building Regulations". Ministry of Housing and Urban Development, Office of National Building Regulations, Iran Development Publishing.
- Mousavi, M. H., and Hammam, M. (2014). "Modeling the effect of carbon dioxide emissions on global warming". Environmental Science and Engineering Quarterly, 4(2), 1-10.
- Mahlabpour, F., and Shafihpor, M. (2015). "The effect of optimizing energy consumption on indoor air quality". Environmental Science, 40(4), 102-101.
- IPCC. (2014). “Climate Change 2013: The physical science basis: Working group I contribution to the fifth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change”. Cambridge University Press, 20-25.
- Calvo, L. M., Domingo, R. (2017). “CO2 emissions reduction and energy efficiency improvements in paper making drying process control by sensors”. Sustainability, 9(4), 514.
- Rogelj, J., Den Elzen, M., Höhne, N., Fransen, T., Fekete, H., Winkler, H ... & Meinshausen, M. (2016). “Paris Agreement climate proposals need a boost to keep warming well below 2 C”. Nature, 534(7609), 631-639.
- Solomon, S., Qin, D., Maning, M., Averyt, K., Marquis, M., & Tignor, M. M. (Eds.). (2007). “Working group I contribution to the intergovernmental panel on climate change fourth assessment report climate change 2007: The physical science basis”. IPCC WG1 Fourth Assessment Report, 56-57.
9.Triantafyllidis, S., Ries, R. J., & Kaplanidou, K. K. (2018). “Carbon dioxide emissions of spectators’ transportation in collegiate sporting events: Comparing on-campus and off-campus stadium locations”. Sustainability, 10(1), 241.
10.] Dosumu, A., Colbeck, I., & Bragg, R. (2017). “Greenhouse gas emissions as a result of spectators travelling to football in England”. Scientific reports, 7(1), 1-7.
- Collins, A., & Flynn, A. (2008). “Measuring the environmental sustainability of a major sporting event: A case study of the FA Cup Final”. Tourism Economics, 14(4), 751-768.
- Thibault, L. (2009). “Globalization of Sport: An Inconvenient Truth1”. Journal of Sport Management, 23(1), 1-20.
- Guzmán, C. A. P., & Fernández, D. J. M. (2014). “Environmental impacts by golf courses and strategies to minimize them: state of the art”. International Journal of Arts & Sciences, 7(3), 403.
- Collins, A., Flynn, A., Munday, M., & Roberts, A. (2007). “Assessing the Environmental Consequences of Major Sporting Events: The 2003/04 FA Cup Final”. Urban Studies, 44(3), 457-476.
15.Wiedmann, T., & Minx, J. (2008). “A definition of ‘carbon footprint”. Ecological economics research trends, 1, 1-11.
16.IEA (International Energy Agency). (2015). “Co2 Emissions from Fuel Combustion Highlights”. Paris: OECD/IEA, 3-5.
- Horbach, J., Rammer, C., & Rennings, K. (2012). “Determinants of eco-innovations by type of environmental impact-The role of regulatory push/pull, technology push and market pull”. Ecological economics, 78, 112-122.
- FIFA World Cup. (2018). “Russia Greenhouse gas accounting report, recognition”. Research and urban planning.5 (18),1-20.
- Babiak, K., & Wolfe, R. (2009). “Determinants of corporate social responsibility in professional sport: Internal and external factors”. Journal of sport management, 23(6), 717-742.
- Babiak, K & Trendafilova, S. (2011). “CSR and environmental responsibility: motives and pressures to adopt green management practices”. Corporate social responsibility and environmental management, 18(1), 11-24.
- CTV006. (2006). “Sports and leisure Introducing energy saving opportunities for business”. Carbon Trust,1-18.
- ECG078. (2011). “Energy use in sports and recreation buildings”. The Government’s Energy Efficiency Best Practice programme,1-40.
23.Smulders, T. (2012). “Green Stadiums: As Green as Grass”. A Thesis submitted for the award of MSc in University of Utrecht,1-61.
- Conway, C. J. (2013). “An Investigation into Energy Consumption and Existing Energy Management Practices in a Dublin Sports Centre”. A Thesis submitted for the award of MSc in Technological University Dublin,1-180.
- Schmidt, C. W. (2006). “Putting the earth in play: environmental awareness and sports. Environ”. Health Perspect. 114, 286–295.
- Dietrich, A., & Melville, C. (2011). “Energy Demand Characteristics and The Potential for Energy Efficiency in Sports Stadium and Arenas”. A Thesis submitted for the award of MSc in Duke University,1-51.
- Fantozzi, F., Leccese, F., Salvadori, G., Rocca, M., & Garofalo, M. (2016). “LED Lighting for Indoor Sports Facilities: Can Its Use Be Considered as Sustainable Solution from a Techno-Economic Standpoint?”. Sustainability, 8(7), 618.
- IEA. (2019). “Key world energy statistics". https://www.iea.org/reports/key-world-energy-statistics-2020. International Energy Agency, August 2020.
29.IEA. (2018). “Key world energy statistics”. Retrieved from https://www.iea.org/statistics/?country=IRAN&year=2016&category/Emissions&indicator=TotCO2&mode=chart&dataTable=indicators/Accessed September 2016.
30.Shabani, Z. D., Shahnazi, R. (2019). “Energy consumption, carbon dioxide emissions, information and communications technology, and gross domestic product in Iranian economic sectors: a panel causality analysis”. Energy, 169, 1064-1078.
31.Young, R. (2015). “A survey of energy uses in water companies”. American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy, 1-23.
32.Chernushenko, D. (2005). “Sustainable sport management”. Azadi, Mehri., Publications of the National Olympic Committee of Iran. 18-216.
33.Eskilsson, A. (2017). “Energy flow mapping of a sports facility: Energy flow mapping and suitable key performance indicator formulation for Rocklunda sports facility”. School of Business, Society and Engineering,1-68.
- Brander, M., Sood, A., Wylie, C., Haughton, A., & Lovell, J. (2011). “Technical Paper| Electricity-specific emission factors for grid electricity”. Ecometrica, Emission factors,1-22.
35.European Committee for Standardization. (2007). “EN 12193, Light and Lighting-Sports Lighting; European Committee for Standardization”. British standard, 1-39.
36.Energy Efficiency Best Practice Programme (1997). “Good Practice Guide 223 ‘Cost-Effective Lighting For Sports Facilities: A Guide For Centre Managers And Operators”. Bpp, London.
37.IEA. (2011). “Key world energy statistics”, 2-82.
38.Nakamura, S. (2015). “Development of the Blue Light-Emitting Diode”. SPIE Newsroom: Washington, DC, USA.10-18.
39.Sydney Water (2011). “Sydney Water’s Best practice guideline for holistic open space”, Australia/sydneywater.com.au, 76-81.
)