نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دانشجوی دکترا، دانشکده علوم ورزشی، دانشگاه رازی، کرمانشاه، ایران
2 دانشگاه رازی کرمانشاه، دکترا
3 دانشکده علوم ورزشی، دانشگاه رازی، کرمانشاه، ایران
چکیده
هدف دیدبان حکمرانی ورزشی آگاهی دادن به فدراسیون‌های ورزشی است که چگونه فعالیت‌های خود را به شیوۀ مؤثر سازماندهی کنند و بر فعالیت‌های خود نظارت داشته باشند. هدف این پژوهش، شناسایی نماگرها و تعیین شاخص دیدبان حکمرانی ورزشی فدراسیون‌ها بود. روش پژوهش آمیخته از نوع اکتشافی متوالی؛ و جامعۀ آماری در بخش کیفی خبرگان (15 نفر) و در بخش کمی 224 نفر از رؤسای هیأت‌های ورزشی استان‌های همدان، کرمانشاه و کردستان بودند. ابزار در بخش کیفی مصاحبه و در بخش کمی پرسشنامه‌ای مطابق با عوامل شناسایی‌شده طراحی شد. بررسی روایی واگرا پرسشنامه، با تحلیل عامل اکتشافی (چرخش واریماکس) چهار عامل شفافیت، دموکراسی، نظارت و همبستگی (58/0 درصد تبیین واریانس) و 25 نماگر را در ساختار شاخص آشکار کرد. در بررسی روایی همگرا، تحلیل عاملی تأییدی وجود چهار عامل را تأیید کرد و پایایی شاخص نیز با بررسی آلفای کرونباخ (91/0) بالا بود. یافته‌ها نشان داد امتیاز شاخص دیدبان حکمرانی ورزشی در ابعاد شفافیت 67/2، دموکراسی 56/2، بازرسی 42/2 و همبستگی 43/2 و امتیاز نهایی شاخص 38 درصد و پایین‌تر از متوسط بود. نتایج این مطالعه به شناسایی عوامل حکمرانی ورزشی به‌منظور اولویت‌بندی و تنظیم اقدامات در فدراسیون‌های ورزشی منجر شد.
کلیدواژه‌ها
عنوان مقاله [English]
The Mixed Analysis of Indicators and Sport Governance Observer Index
نویسندگان [English]
- behesht ahmady 1
- bahram yousefi 2
- hossain eydi 3
1 PhD Student, Faculty of sport Sciences, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran
2
3 Faculty of sport Sciences, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran
چکیده [English]
The sport governance observer (SGO) aims to inform sport federations about how to organize their affairs in an effective manner and to monitor their governance practices. The aim of this study was to identify indicators and to determine sport governance index in federations. The method was mixed and of sequential exploratory kind. The statistical population in the qualitative section consisted of experts (N=15) and in quantitative section consisted of 224 heads of sport boards in Hamedan, Kermanshah and Kurdistan provinces. Interview was used in qualitative section and a questionnaire designed in accordance with the identified factors was applied in quantitative section. In divergent validity of the questionnaire, exploratory factor analysis (Varimax rotation) identified four factors: transparency, democracy, inspection and solidarity (0.58% of the variance explanation) and 25 indicators in the index structure. In convergent validity, confirmatory factor analysis confirmed the four extracted factors and the reliability of the index was high using Cronbach’s alpha (0.91). The findings showed that sport governance observer index score was for transparency (2.67), democracy (2.56), inspection (2.42) and solidarity (2.43). Final score was %38 and less than average. These results identified sport governance factors to prioritize and plan measures in sport federations.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
- Democracy
- Good Governance
- inspection and balance
- solidarity
- transparency
- Alm, J. (2013). “Action for Good Governance in International Sports Organisations”. Final report. Copenhagen: Play the Game/ Danish Institute for sports studies, PP: 6- 22.
- Phillips, Alex. (2011). “What should be in a ‘Good Governance Code’ for European Team Sport Federations?”. Master’s thesis, PP: 5-20.
- Saneei, M. (1385). “Good governance is a new concept in governmental management”. Tadbir mountly magazine on management. 17(178):26-34. [In Persian].
- Weiss, T, G. (2000). “Governance, Good Governance and Global Governance, Conceptual and Actual Challenges”. Third World Quarterly, 21(5): 795-815.
- UNDP. (2007). “Governance Indicators– A User’s Guide”. P: 18-20, www.undp.org/execbrd/pdf/dp08-45_AnnexIII.pdf
- Knoll M. and Zloczysti P. (2011). “The Good Governance Indicators of the Millennium Challenge Account: How Many Dimensions are Really Being Measured”.World Development, 40(5), 900- 915.
- Mahmoudi, J.,Ronaghi, M.H. & Ronaghi, M. (1392). “Determining the weight and relationship between good governance indicators in Iran”. Risstudies quarterly. 16(62): 59-87. [In Persian].
- Forster, J. & Pope, N. (2004). “The Political Economy of Global Sporting Organisations”.Abingdon: Routledge, p: 72-73.
- Henry, I. & Lee, P. C. (2004). “Governance and ethics in sport”. In: Beech, J. and Chadwick, S. (eds). The Business of Sport Management. London: Pearson, PP.25-42.
- Chappelet, J, L. & Kübler-Mabbott, B. (2008). “The International Olympic Committee and the Olympic System: The governance of world sport”. Abingdon: Routledge, pp: 177-181.
- Walters. G., Trenberth. L. & Tacon, R. (2010). “Good Governance in Sport: A Survey of UK National Governing Bodies of Sport”.London: Birk beck Sport Business Centre. PP: 3-5.
- Sport and Recreation Alliance: the UK confederation of sports federations. (2011). “Voluntary Code of Good Governance for the Sport and Recreation Sector”.London: SRA. PP: 6-8.
- Geeraert, A. (2015a). “Indicators and benchmarking tools for sports governance”.In: Transparency International (Ed), Global corruption report: corruption in sport. London: Routledge.
- AGGIS group. (2013). “AGGIS Sports Governance Observer”. In J. Alm (Ed), Action for Good Governance in International Sports Organisations. Final report (PP: 218-221). Copenhagen: Play the Game/ Danish Institute for sports studies.
- Geeraert, A. (2015b). “Sports governance observer. The legitimacy crisis in international sports governance”. Report / October 2015, Pp: 5-37.
- Geeraert, A., Alm, J., & Groll, M. (2014).“Good governance in international sport organizations: an analysis of the 35 Olympic sport governing bodies”.International journal of sport policy and politics, 6(3), 281-306.
- Miscă, F., & Hanu, E. (2015). “Governance in sport-a necessity in the management of the sports organizations”. DISCOBOLUL, 2(40), 63-67.
- Parent, M. M., & MacDonald, D. (2016). “Stakeholder perceptions on the democratic governance of major sports events”. Sport Management Review, 19(4), 402-416.
- Whitford, M., Phi, G. T., & Dredge, D. (2014). “Principles to practice: Indicators for measuring event governance performance”.Event Management, 18(3), 387-403.
- Hover, P., Dijk, B., Breedveld, K., & van Eekeren, F. (2016). “Integrity & sport events.”: WJH Mulier Institute & Utrecht University.pp:5-7.
- Thomas M. (2009). “What Do the Worldwide Governance Indicators Measure”? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, J-PART 16(1): 5-22.
- Bazargan, A. (1395). “Introduction to qualitative and mixed research methods”. Didar publication. 3rd edition. P: 48-55. [In Persian].
- Transparency International. (2011). “Safe Hands: building integrity and transparency at FIFA”. Berlin: Transparency International, p: 5-8.
- OECD .(2004). “Principles of Corporate Governance”. Paris: OECD. Pp: 12-50.
- Robinson, L. (2012). “Contemporary issues in the performance of sports organisations”. In L. Robinson, P. Chelladurai, G. Bodet and P. Downward, Routledge handbook of sport management (Pp: 3-15), New York: Routledge.
- Woods, N. (1999). “Good Governance in International Organizations”. Global Governance, 5(1), 39- 61.
- International Olympic Committee. (2008). “Basic universal principles of good governance of the Olympic and sports movement”. Lausanne: Pp: 3-12.
- Bovens, M. (2007). “Analysing and assessing accountability: a conceptual framework”.European Law Journal, 13 (4), 447–468.
- International Olympic Committee. (2017). “International forum for sports integrity”. Declaration Lausanne, 15 February,. Pp, 1-2.
)