نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استادیار مدیریت ورزشی دانشگاه اصفهان، اصفهان، ایران.

2 دکتری مدیریت ورزشی

چکیده

هدف از این تحقیق شناسایی عوامل موثر در نهادینه کردن ورزش همگانی در ایران بود. روش انجام تحقیق کیفی و از نوع اکتشافی بود. جامعه آماری این پژوهش را کلیه افراد متخصص در زمینه ورزش همگانی و نهادینه سازی تشکیل می‌دادند. نمونه ها از طریق روش نمونه‌گیری گلوله برفی انتخاب شدند و تعداد نمونه‌های که با آنها تا رسیدن به اشباع نظری مصاحبه شد 15 نفر بود. روایی مصاحبه ها از طریق بررسی شکل و محتوای سوالات توسط اساتید سنجیده شد و پایایی ابزار تحقیق از طریق روش باز آزمون محاسبه گردید و ضریب پایایی مصاحبه ها 83 درصد بدست آمد. نتایج تحقیق نشان داد چهار دسته عوامل فردی، گروهی، سازمانی و محیطی در نهادینه کردن ورزش همگانی در ایران موثر هستند. با توجه به حجم گسترده عوامل هر دسته، در این مقاله صرفاً عوامل فردی شامل، پذیرش، باور و نگرش، انگیزش، آزادی انتخاب، تعهد، بازخورد و ویژگی های زمینه ای مورد بررسی قرار گرفته است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

The Factors Influencing Institutionalization of Sport for All in Iran: Individual Factors

نویسندگان [English]

  • Ahmad Ali Asefi 1
  • Hasan Asadi 2
  • mohamad Khabiri 2

1 Assistant Professor of Sport Management of Isfahan University, Isfahan, Iran.

2

چکیده [English]

With the extension of technology and industrialization of communities, people's active lifestyle has changed to a sedentary lifestyle. This sedentary lifestyle has many complications and negative outcomes. Sport for all is a form of "physical activity" or regular participation in physical activity that it can reduce inactivity and its complications. Therefore, the aim of this study was to identify those factors influencing the institutionalization of sport for all in Iran. The research method was exploratory qualitative. The statistical population consisted of all those who had experience in sport for all and institutionalization. The sample was selected by snowball sampling method. 15 subjects were interviewed to reach theoretical saturation. The validity of the interviews was assessed by examining the form and content of the questions by the professors and their reliability was calculated through retest method and their reliability coefficient was calculated as (%83). The results revealed that four categories including individual, team, organizational and environmental factors influenced the institutionalization of sport for all in Iran. In this article, due to the widespread size of factors in each category, merely individual factors including acceptance, belief and attitude, motivation, freedom of choice, commitment, feedback and contextual attributes were examined. Individual factors are a set of factors that are related to the person himself and include psychological, attitude, motivational states, and contextual attributes.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Acceptation
  • Commitment
  • Freedom of choice
  • sport for all
  • Institutionalization
1. Mozaffari SAA, and Ghareh, M. A. . Iran Sport for all situation and comparison with several selected countries of the world. . Journal of Motion and Exercise Science,. (2005). ; 3(6),: 151-71. (In Persian).
2. Waxman AJF, bulletin n. WHO global strategy on diet, physical activity and health. 2004;25(3):292-302.
3. Jensen MK, Chiuve SE, Rimm EB, Dethlefsen C, Tjønneland A, Joensen AM, et al. Obesity, behavioral lifestyle factors, and risk of acute coronary events. 2008;117(24):3062-9.
4. Löllgen H, Böckenhoff A, Knapp GJIjosm. Physical activity and all-cause mortality: an updated meta-analysis with different intensity categories. 2009;30(03):213-24.
5. Anjzab B, Bokayi, M., Farajekhoda, T., and Khoshbin, A. . Inactivity, most common high-risk behaviors of middle-aged women. . Tolodanesh Journal. (2009);3, 4:23-33, (In Persian).
6. Azkia M, and Ghaffari, G. R. . Sociology of Development.  . Tehran: : Kayhan Publication. (2007), (In Persian).
7. Physical Education Organization. Detailed study on the development of sport for all and recreation sport.  (2003), (In Persian).
8. Saidi AA. Investigating the Affective Factors on Rate of Citizens' tendency to Participation in sport for all, Sport for all and Tehran Citizens. . Tehran: : Society and Culture Publication. (2011), (In Persian).
9. Mull RF, Bayless KG, Jamieson LM. Recreational sport management. 2005.
10. Palm J, & Wolfyang, B. . Sport for all as s departure into unknown lands of sport. Germany: 11 (5), 25, (2002).
11. Ghafouri F. Study of the types of sport for all and desired recreations of community and presenting a model for future planning. . Tehran: National Office for Management and Sport Development, Islamic Republic of Iran Physical Education Organization. (2007), (In Persian).
12. Saffari M. Designing the Sport for all Model of Iran. Tehran: Tarbiat Modarres University.; (2012), (In Persian).
13. Atghia N. Analytical review of the history, goals and strategies of sport for all in Iran (from 1359 to 1380). Journal of Sport and Motor Sciences (2001);1: 81-75, (In Persian).
14. Kashif MM. Study of the state of sport for all in Iran and recommendations for its development. Tehran: National plan, Iranian Scientific Council. (2000), (In Persian).
15. Ghareh MA. Study of the status of sport for all in Iran and its comparison with several countries of world. : Tarbiat Moallem University.; (2005), (In Persian).
16. Azarnia H. Studying the tendency of students of Tabriz University to sport for all. : Tabriz University; (2005), (In Persian).
17. Attarzadeh Hosseini SR, and Sohrabi, M. . Attitude and tendency of People of Mashhad to Motor and Sport Activities. Olympic Quarterly (2007); 15(1),:37-48, (In Persian).
18. Mohammad Gholinia J. Establishing background and planning for the generalization of sport,. Tehran: research project. (2004), (In Persian).
19. Scott RW. Institutions and Organizations,. Second ed. , ed. Thousand Oaks, CA.: Sage; (2001).
20. Roshanandal Arbanani T. The explanation of mass media position in the institutionalization of sport for all in the country. . Journal of Motion, (2007);33, :165-78, (In Persian).
21. Gholipour A. Institutions and Organizations (Institutional Ecology of Organization). Tehran: : Samt Publication. (2005), (In Persian).
22. Goodman PS, Bazerman M, Conlon E. Institutionalization of Planned Organizational Change. CARNEGIE-MELLON UNIV PITTSBURGH PA GRADUATE SCHOOL OF INDUSTRIAL ADMINISTRATION; 1979.
23. Gholipour A. Sociology of Organizations, Sociological Approach to Organization and Management. Tehran: : Samt Publication. (2011), (In Persian).
24. Hesse-Biber S. Approaches to qualitative research: A reader on theory and practice. 2003.
25. Kvale S. InterViews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. . Thousand Oaks, CA, US: : Sage Publications, Inc.; (1994).
26. Bazargan A. Introduction to Qualitative and Mixed Research Methods, Common Approaches in Behavioral Sciences. . Tehran: : Didar Publication. (2008), (In Persian).
27. Goodman PS, Moore BEJHR. Factors affecting acquisition of beliefs about a new reward system. 1976;29(6):571-88.
28. Ehrlich‐Jones L, Lee J, Semanik P, Cox C, Dunlop D, Chang RWJAc, et al. Relationship between beliefs, motivation, and worries about physical activity and physical activity participation in persons with rheumatoid arthritis. 2011;63(12):1700-5.
29. Al-Eisa ES, Al-Sobayel HIJJon, metabolism. Physical activity and health beliefs among Saudi women. 2012;2012.
30. Brinthaupt TM, Kang M, Anshel MHJJoSB. Changes in Exercise Commitment Following a Values-Based Wellness Program. 2013;36(1).
31. Kelman HCJJocr. Compliance, identification, and internalization three processes of attitude change. 1958;2(1):51-60.
32. Davison KK, Lawson CTJIjobn, activity p. Do attributes in the physical environment influence children's physical activity? A review of the literature. 2006;3(1):19.
33. Schein EHJSMR. Organizational socialization and the profession of management. 1967;30.
34. Spray CM, John Wang C, Biddle SJ, Chatzisarantis NLJEjoss. Understanding motivation in sport: An experimental test of achievement goal and self determination theories. 2006;6(01):43-51.
35. Deci EL, Ryan RMJCpPc. Self-determination theory: A macrotheory of human motivation, development, and health. 2008;49(3):182.
36. Salancik GRJNdiob. Commitment and the control of organizational behavior and belief. 1977;1:54.
37. Casper JM, Stellino MBJJoP, Administration R. Demographic Predictors of Recreational Tennis Participants' Sport Commitment. 2008;26(3).
38. Weiss MR, Williams L. The why of youth sport involvement: A developmental perspective on motivational processes: A lifespan perspective. Developmental sport and exercise psychology: A lifespan perspective: Fitness Information Technology; 2004.
39. Group LW. Lifelong involvement in sport and physical activity: The LISPA Model. 2016.
40. Soltani Tirani F. Institutionalizing Innovation in Organization, Including Institutionalization Pattern of Improvement and Innovation in Iranian Industrial Organizations. . Tehran: : Publication of Rasa Cultural Services Institute. (1999), (In Persian).
41. Yfantidou G, Tsernou A, Michalopoulos M, Costa GJIJoSM, Recreation, Tourism. Criteria of Participation at the Sport and Recreation Services of Municipal Organizations. 2011;7:1-10.
42. Schoenborn CA, Barnes PM. Leisure-time physical activity among adults: United States, 1997–98. 2002.
43. Farrell L, Shields MAJJotRSSSA. Investigating the economic and demographic determinants of sporting participation in England. 2002;165(2):335-48.
44. Ehsani M, Kozechian, H., & Keshgar, S. . Investigation and analysis of restrictive factors and participation rate of Tehran women in sport-recreational activities. . Journal of Sport Sciences Research,. (2007);17:87-63, (In Persian).
45. Cerin E, Leslie EJSs, medicine. How socio-economic status contributes to participation in leisure-time physical activity. 2008;66(12):2596-609.
46. Assembly NI. Barriers to Sports and Physical Activity Participation. Research Paper; 2010.