Sport Management Journal

Current Issue

By Issue

By Author

By Subject

Author Index

Keyword Index

About Journal

Aims and Scope

Editorial Board

Publication Ethics

Indexing and Abstracting

Related Links

FAQ

Peer Review Process

Journal Metrics

News

Publication policies

Providing a Model for Improving the Educational Innovation of Physical Education Teachers Using the DEMATEL Method

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Department of Sport Management, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran

2 Department of Sport Management, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran.

3 Department of Educational Methods and Programs, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Introduction: The aim of this study was to investigate the factors affecting the improvement of educational innovation of physical education teachers.
Methods: The research method was mixed (qualitative-quantitative) in which the qualitative part was done in the form of content analysis. The statistical population included those who were aware of the subject of the research and according to the purposeful selection, 13 people were identified as the sample. Research tools included semi-structured interviews and a researcher-made questionnaire. The validity of the questionnaire was examined according to the experts. Also, the reliability of this questionnaire was evaluated using Cronbach's alpha calculation method (α = 0.81). In the quantitative analysis of the research, Dematel method was used. All research data analysis process was performed in EXCEL software.
Results: The results showed that 8 general factors including social issues, motivational issues, regulatory aspects, infrastructure, specialized knowledge, government support, supportive laws and regulations and management issues are important to improve the educational innovation of physical education teachers.
Conclusion: According to the results, it was found that specialized knowledge, government support and infrastructure as causal factors and supportive laws and regulations, management issues, regulatory aspects, social issues and motivational issues were identified as disability factors. In other words, investing in improving specialized knowledge, government support and infrastructure promotes educational innovation.

Keywords

References
Adibnia, A. (2014). Investigating the barriers to the implementation of active teaching methods in primary schools in Tehran, Curriculum and Educational Innovation Research Institute, Educational Research and Planning Organization. (In Persian)
Ahadi, P. (2017). Investigating the Relationship between Organizational Culture and Teachers' Tendency to Educational Innovations in Ardabil Primary Schools, M.Sc. Thesis, and Payame Noor University of Tabriz. (In Persian)
Aizawa, K., Orr, M., Inoue, Y., Nagazumi, J., & Yoshida, M. (2021). Leveraging sport events for sustainable sport participation: how schools contribute to sport development through events. European Sport Management Quarterly. 1-21.
Babaei Osalu, H; Sohrabi, Z, Khajeh Azad, and M. (2015). Investigating the Creativity of Medical Professors Based on Torrance Theory: Iran University of Medical Sciences, Journal of Educational Strategies in Medical Sciences, (318), 143-138. (In Persian)
Barrichello, A., Morano, R. S., Feldmann, P. R., & Jacomossi, R. R. (2020). The importance of education in the context of innovation and competitiveness of nations. International Journal of Education Economics and Development, 11(2), 204-224.
Criollo-C, S., Moscoso-Zea, O., Guerrero-Arias, A., Jaramillo-Alcázar, A., & Luján-Mora, S. (2021). Mobile Learning as the Key to Higher Education Innovation: A Systematic Mapping. IEEE Access, 9, 462-476.
Drach-Zahovy, A., Somech, A., Granot, M. and Spitzer, A. (2014). “Can we win them all? Benefits and costs of structured and flexible innovation – implementations”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 212-34.
Ehsani Quds, H, Seyed Abbaszadeh, M. (2015).The Relationship between Learning Organization Components and Creativity and Innovation of High School and Pre-University Teachers, 3(12): 1-20. (In Persian)
Farzaneh, S. (2015). Investigating the Relationship between Organizational Innovation of Schools and the Performance of High School Teachers in Education of Chahardangeh District, International Symposium on Management Sciences, and Center for Strategies for Achieving Sustainable Development. (In Persian)
Heidarifard, S, Sharifian, I. (2013). Identifying and comparing barriers to donors' participation in the development of sports facilities, Journal of Sports Management Studies, 2015. 41, 96-81. (In Persian)
Hosseini, A. (2013). The nature of creativity and its cultivation methods, Astan Quds Razavi Publications, fourth edition. (In Persian)
Huong, V. T. M. (2020). Factors Affecting Instructional Leadership in Secondary Schools to Meet Vietnam's General Education Innovation. International Education Studies. 13(2), 48-60.
Irmansyah, J., Lumintuarso, R., Sugiyanto, F., & Sukoco, P. (2020). Children’s social skills through traditional sport games in primary schools. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan. 39(1), 39-53.
Kamyabi, S; Badrian, A; Samiei, D, Poor Eskandari, R. (2012). Assessing the knowledge required by teachers to teach experimental sciences in elementary school, Institute of Educational Studies. 2012. (In Persian)
Lee YD, Chang HM. (2014). Leadweship style and innovation ability: an empirical study of Taiwanese wire and cable companies. Journal of American Academy of isines Cambridge. 9(2): 218-219.
Lv, B., Zhao, Y., & Teng, S. (2020). Community Education Innovation and Practice in the New Era. In 2019 International Conference on Education Science and Economic Development (ICESED 2019). Atlantis Press. 1-8.
Martine, E. (2009). An Organisational Culture model to promote creativity and innovation. Journal of Industrial Psychology, 28(4), 58-65
Panayides, P., Robinson, C., & Tymms, P. (2010). The assessment revolution that has passed England by: Rasch measurement. British Educational Research Journal, 36(4), 611-626.
Parnak, J, (2015). The Relationship between Organizational Trust and Organizational Innovation in Teachers' Schools, Quarterly Journal of New Psychological Research, 10(38):76. (In Persian)
Polevikova, O., & Shvets, t. (2021). Partisipative approach as educational innovation of professional training future teachers. Bulletin of the Cherkasy Bohdan Khmelnytsky National University. Series" Pedagogical Sciences". (4). 176-182.
Rezaian, A., Pour Ezat, A. (2013). Fundamentals of Organization and Management, Tehran: Samat Publications. (In Persian)
Schilder, E., & Redmond, T. (2019). Measuring media literacy inquiry in higher education: Innovation in assessment. Journal of Media Literacy Education. 11(2), 95-121.
Shuhratovich, I. U. (2020). Application of innovation in teaching process. European Journal of Research and Reflection in Educational Sciences. 8(5), 4-8.
Thorsteinsson, G. (2014). Innovation education to improve social responsibility through general education. Tiltai.61 (4), 71-78.
Tsangaridou, N. (2017). Early childhood teachers’ views about teaching physical education: challenges and recommendations. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy. 22(3), 283-300.
Uzunöz, F. S., & Demirhan, G. (2017).The effect of creative drama on critical thinking in preservice physical education teachers. Thinking Skills and Creativity. 24, 164-174.
Wagner, E.R. & Hansen, E.N. (2009). Innovation in large versus small companies: insights from the US wood products industry", Management Decision, 51(6): 473-492.
Sport Management Journal
Volume 15, Issue 2
July 2023
Pages 248-233
Files
History
  • Receive Date: 23 December 2021
  • Revise Date: 10 May 2022
  • Accept Date: 14 June 2022
Share
How to cite
Statistics