The Comparison of Performance Evaluation Indicators of Club Coaches from Experts, Athletes and Coaches' Viewpoints

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Ph.D University of Guilan

2 Ph.D Payam Noor University

3 M.Sc University of Guilan

4 Ph.D Student University of Guilan

Abstract
The aim of the present research was to compare the performance evaluation indicators of club coaches from experts, athletes and coaches' viewpoints. The statistical population included all physical education experts of Guilan province, heads, deputy heads and secretaries of physical education boards, athletes and coaches from Rasht city (n=470) and 345 subjects (73.4%) participated in the research. The questionnaire designed by Mclean and Zakrajsek (1996) which included 56 items and 6 dimensions was used to collect data and the content and face validity was confirmed by 20 university experts and the internal consistency of was calculated by Cronbach's alpha (α=0.75). Exploratory factor analysis with varimax rotation and non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis test were used to analyze data. Factor analysis result showed that coaches' performance evaluation indicators could be divided into 8 factors with eigenvalue>1: task and technical behaviors, athletes’ growth and instruction, coaches’ personal performance, public relations, fanatical affairs, team performance, team maintenance and team recognition and management. Also, from the participants’ viewpoints, task and technical behaviors (4.57±0.39), athletes’ growth and instruction (4.48±0.42) and coaches’ personal and technical performance (4.44±1.27) were the most important evaluation dimensions of coaches’ performance. In addition, the priority of task and technical behaviors, athletes' growth and instruction and public relations among the three groups (athletes, coaches and experts) was significant (P≤0.05). Generally, organizations and sport coaches can use all these indicators to evaluate coaches.

Keywords


Volume 5, Issue 2 - Serial Number 2
Summer 2013
Pages 191-214

  • Receive Date 15 March 2011
  • Revise Date 07 August 2013
  • Accept Date 19 May 2012